Nujan Split Reader
Distributed Systems & Infrastructure · arXiv:2610.13830

Scheduling in Cloud,Fog, and Edge Computing: A Comparative Analysis and Decision Framework for Technique Selection

Authors: Rana Ghazali, Douglas G. Down (arXiv:2610.13830) · arXiv: 2610.13830

Core Methodological Innovation

Featured in Nujan's Distributed Systems & Infrastructure Literature Digest. Open side-by-side with interactive equation, methodology, and citation breakdowns.

Key Quantitative & Theoretical Takeaway: Open arXiv:2610.13830 in Nujan to inspect every mathematical symbol, experimental baseline, and citation directly alongside the original PDF.

Abstract

The increasing heterogeneity and dynamism of cloud, fog, and edge computing make scheduling a challenging problem involving diverse resource capabilities, workload characteristics, latency and energy constraints, and competing optimization objectives. Although numerous scheduling methods have been proposed, existing reviews often provide fragmented coverage of computing environments, scheduling granularities, or technique families, offering limited guidance on selecting an appropriate approach for specific requirements. This review presents a comparative analysis of task, job, and workflow scheduling across the cloud, fog, and edge paradigms, covering heuristic, metaheuristic, learning-based, and hybrid techniques. Studies published between 2020 and 2026 are analyzed according to scheduling granularity, computing environment, optimization objectives, constraints, performance metrics, and evaluation tools. The analysis highlights trade-offs among computational efficiency, optimization capability, adaptability, and implementation complexity across technique families. Heuristic methods offer low computational overhead for relatively stable scheduling conditions, whereas metaheuristic methods are suited to complex and multi-objective optimization problems. Learning-based methods provide greater adaptability to dynamic and uncertain environments but introduce data, training, inference, and convergence requirements. Hybrid methods combine complementary capabilities but generally increase computational and implementation complexity. Based on these findings, a decision framework is developed to guide technique selection according to workload characteristics, environmental conditions, optimization objectives, resource constraints, and computational requirements.

Step-by-Step Equation & Methodology Breakdown

What is Scheduling in Cloud,Fog, and Edge Computing: A Comparative Analysis and Decision Framework for Technique Selection (arXiv:2610.13830) about?

The increasing heterogeneity and dynamism of cloud, fog, and edge computing make scheduling a challenging problem involving diverse resource capabilities, workload characteristics, latency and energy constraints, and competing optimization objectives. Although numerous scheduling methods have been proposed, existing reviews often provide fragmented coverage of computing environments, scheduling granularities, or technique families, offering limited guidance on selecting an appropriate approach for specific requirements. This review presents a comparative analysis of task, job, and workflow scheduling across the cloud, fog, and edge paradigms, covering heuristic, metaheuristic, learning-based, and hybrid techniques. Studies published between 2020 and 2026 are analyzed according to scheduling granularity, computing environment, optimization objectives, constraints, performance metrics, and evaluation tools. The analysis highlights trade-offs among computational efficiency, optimization capability, adaptability, and implementation complexity across technique families. Heuristic methods offer low computational overhead for relatively stable scheduling conditions, whereas metaheuristic methods are suited to complex and multi-objective optimization problems. Learning-based methods provide greater adaptability to dynamic and uncertain environments but introduce data, training, inference, and convergence requirements. Hybrid methods combine complementary capabilities but generally increase computational and implementation complexity. Based on these findings, a decision framework is developed to guide technique selection according to workload characteristics, environmental conditions, optimization objectives, resource constraints, and computational requirements.

How can I read arXiv:2610.13830 with interactive explanations?

Visit https://nujan.app/abs/2610.13830 to open Scheduling in Cloud,Fog, and Edge Computing: A Comparative Analysis and Decision Framework for Technique Selection in Nujan's split-screen research workspace with instant equation and methodology breakdowns.

Read Any arXiv Paper Side-by-Side in Nujan

Replace arxiv.org with nujan.app on any arXiv URL (for example, https://nujan.app/abs/2006.11239) to open the PDF and AI research partner side-by-side.

Launch Interactive Split Reader for ARXIV-2610.13830